Home > Uncategorized > FO: Jennifer

FO: Jennifer


Meet Jennifer!
Yarn: Dale of Norway Baby Ull for doll, panties, and dress. Crystal Palace cotton chenille for hair. Embroidery floss for face.
Needles: #3 for the doll, #2 for the dress
Doll pattern: Basic Doll from Toys to Knit by Tracy Chapman
Dress pattern: Me!
Turtlegirl76 suggested eyelets on the waist of the dress with an eye toward running a ribbon through. I decided not to do the ribbon, but I liked the eyelet idea.

Notes: This is the third one of these dolls I’ve made. This is not because I have any great love for the pattern. In fact, I think it’s rather poorly written, but my daughter seems to love these dolls. She picked out the color for the hair and dress. She specifically requested a dress, not a skirt and shirt, and asked for a purple heart. When the doll was done, she elected to find a scrap of Jayne hat yarn and make it into a hair tie.


At this point, I don’t have a whole lot more I can say about the pattern beyond what I’ve said about the previous dolls. Also, I’m tired and my wit has preceded me to bed. I’ll be joining it in a moment.


Here’s Emily’s original concept drawing. The main difference is that she picked out hot pink hair when we went to Charlotte Yarn, but I think that’s mainly because she felt like she had to pick whatever color they had, and that was the closest to red. Once she’d picked it, there was no swaying her to any other color. She also made sure to tell me early on that the dress should be sleeveless, unlike the drawing.

Emily chose the name Jennifer in the same way she chose her other two dolls’ names – by getting me to go to a baby names site on the web so she could pick one from a list. She tells me that Jennifer is older than Taylor but younger than Elizabeth. The three dolls have already had some pillow fights, so it looks like Jennifer is fitting in just fine.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags: , ,
  1. March 7th, 2008 at 12:34 | #1

    Jennifer turned out very cute! I like the look of the hot pink hair. Just think of it as Strawberry blond. =)

  2. March 7th, 2008 at 12:34 | #2

    Jennifer turned out very cute! I like the look of the hot pink hair. Just think of it as Strawberry blond. =)

  3. March 7th, 2008 at 13:16 | #3

    Weclome to the family, Jennifer! I love your name!

  4. March 7th, 2008 at 13:16 | #4

    Weclome to the family, Jennifer! I love your name!

  5. Anonymous
    March 8th, 2008 at 00:36 | #5

    Heehee, this is cute. Wonder if she’ll end up with 7 dolls. One for every day of the week. Haha.

  6. Anonymous
    March 8th, 2008 at 00:36 | #6

    Heehee, this is cute. Wonder if she’ll end up with 7 dolls. One for every day of the week. Haha.

  7. March 8th, 2008 at 00:36 | #7

    Oops. This was me!

  8. March 8th, 2008 at 00:36 | #8

    Oops. This was me!

  9. March 8th, 2008 at 01:13 | #9

    How difficult are these patterns? I would love to make something like this for my Sylvia, but I’m worried that it wouldn’t work so well, I’m not that great a knitter. Hehe.

  10. March 8th, 2008 at 01:13 | #10

    How difficult are these patterns? I would love to make something like this for my Sylvia, but I’m worried that it wouldn’t work so well, I’m not that great a knitter. Hehe.

  11. March 8th, 2008 at 04:09 | #11

    Well, I felt this particular pattern could have been clearer, but don’t let that stop you. Really, all you have to do is knit some rectangles and sew them together. Long skinny ones for the arms and legs, a medium-sized one for the head, and a bigger one for the body. Or make ovals, that would work too.

    The arms and legs are stockinette rectangles that taper slightly at the ends, then they’re folded in half and stitched up the side. The body and head were two separate pieces, with some k2togs to taper at the neck, then seamed together. Alternately, you could do them in the round as a tube and I don’t think it’d hurt anything.

    I’m exhausted and probably not making much sense. But yeah, if you can knit a rectangle, you can make this doll.

  12. March 8th, 2008 at 04:09 | #12

    Well, I felt this particular pattern could have been clearer, but don’t let that stop you. Really, all you have to do is knit some rectangles and sew them together. Long skinny ones for the arms and legs, a medium-sized one for the head, and a bigger one for the body. Or make ovals, that would work too.

    The arms and legs are stockinette rectangles that taper slightly at the ends, then they’re folded in half and stitched up the side. The body and head were two separate pieces, with some k2togs to taper at the neck, then seamed together. Alternately, you could do them in the round as a tube and I don’t think it’d hurt anything.

    I’m exhausted and probably not making much sense. But yeah, if you can knit a rectangle, you can make this doll.

  13. March 8th, 2008 at 11:29 | #13

    Hah! I can knit a rectangle. In fact, that’s about all I can knit.

    Thanks. I’ve been meaning to put knitting books on my wishlist since christmas, but I’m such a crappy knitter I’m sort of intimidated by anything that includes anything more complicated than a garter stitch.

  14. March 8th, 2008 at 11:29 | #14

    Hah! I can knit a rectangle. In fact, that’s about all I can knit.

    Thanks. I’ve been meaning to put knitting books on my wishlist since christmas, but I’m such a crappy knitter I’m sort of intimidated by anything that includes anything more complicated than a garter stitch.

  1. No trackbacks yet.
You must be logged in to post a comment.